Karger uses innovative automation tools to make the process of copy editing manuscripts more accurate, efficient, and scalable.

A good research paper takes hard work, dedication, collaboration, systematic study, and collation and reporting of findings – and a high-quality research paper deserves to be read by the world without errors and inconsistencies, in a clean and well-formatted presentation.

Copy editing is a critical and substantial component of the post-acceptance publishing process that ensures research papers are produced to the highest standards. Karger’s in-house editorial team as well as a dedicated team at TNQ work across Karger’s 105 journals to ensure just that.

The Copy Editing Process

Together these teams of experienced copy editors work through approximately 6,500 articles every year, forming a significant part of the work delivery to the authors who publish with us. Their work is even more consequential for papers written by authors whose first language isn’t English. They edit manuscripts according to style guides, look for grammatical errors, clean up typos, and edit language, syntax, and sentence structure as needed.

The two broad aspects of copy editing include:

  • the first review to check spacing, hyphenation, punctuation, and ensure adherence to style guides, and
  • the second and more detailed evaluation of spelling, grammar, and language.

The Need for Innovation through Automation

We found that the first aspect of editing could be automated for enhanced consistency, and the second would benefit from the assistance of a smart program. Therefore, we sought to innovate our copy editing process using automation – a real boon when implemented in the right manner!

Our goals? To improve the quality of edited manuscripts by reducing human errors, shortening the time-to-publish, and ensuring our editors are spending time adding real value to content by eliminating mundane repetitive tasks. We wanted to use automation to elevate the experience of all our stakeholders – authors, editors, and readers.

Auto and Interactive Copy Editing – ACE & ICE

Within our manuscript preparation workflow, we have implemented copy editing automation products from our publishing technologies partner – TNQ Technologies. Called ACE & ICE (short for Auto Copy Editing and Interactive Copy Editing), these products have been calibrated on data from millions of articles that TNQ has processed over the last two decades across SMT subjects.

ACE & ICE work as widgets on MS Word – an interface that editors are familiar and comfortable with.

How Do ACE & ICE Work?

Automated Copy Editing

When a manuscript goes into editing, it is passed through ACE, which looks for inconsistencies in hyphenation, capitalization, reference structure, and basic formatting, and automatically edits them. This takes away the monotonous exercise of mechanical editing, saving our copy editors precious time.

ACE has over 4,000 built-in rules across industry-standard style guides, such as the AMA, APA, ACS, CMS, etc. Because it is configurable, the journal’s editorial and style specifications are automatically applied, inconsistencies are weeded out, and the system autocorrects elements it is sure of while mapping every change to the journal’s rules.

The product delivers to 95% accuracy.

Interactive Copy Editing

In the next step, the interactive editor highlights spelling and complex grammar errors, assisting copy editors as they diligently review the entire manuscript, ensuring accuracy and consistency. Editors can accept or reject suggestions, and make their own edits over and above the work ICE has done – all in a clean, familiar Word interface.

What makes these products genuinely innovative is that they learn from every action the editors take. They are continuously learning, improving, and updating their rules.

ACE (automated copy editing) ICE (interactive copy editing) Workflow

Improved Quality of Output

With an intelligent and intuitive automation tool lending a reliable helping hand to our editors, we are on the way to achieving:

  • Consistently high-quality copy editing of research articles
  • Elimination of errors
  • Reduced time-to-publish with a significantly faster editing cycle, and happier authors
  • Increasingly satisfied editors who can spend their time adding value through the finer aspects of editing
  • The ability to scale up article processing

What Our Copy Editors Think

“The switch to using the ACE/ICE editing tools has profoundly altered our daily work in Karger’s CE department. Familiarizing myself with these tools and learning their potential has been an engaging and rewarding process, and broadened what was formerly a very narrowly focused method of working. Karger’s use of these tools is still a work in progress, with ongoing optimization and the expectation of achieving enhanced efficiency in the future. Also, the TNQ team in India are friendly, communicative, and enjoyable to work with.” – Richard Pelham

“Having used automated copyediting for almost three years now, my general impression is very positive. I believe ACE & ICE have rendered our work much more efficient. Some of the new tools we use are truly time-saving and irreplaceable. I see real potential in this system as it can progressively learn, adapt and improve, and I’m excited to see that potential exploited to the full in the future.” – Jacek Mackowiak

“While the ACE/ICE editing tools are still in the process of optimization, they are already a great help in our daily work in Karger’s CE department, making the workflow more efficient.” – Christine Frei

A special thanks goes to Swapnil Midha and her TNQ Marketing team for their input.

Are you interested in submitting your research? Find out more about the submission process at Karger.

Related Posts

The next interview in the "Meet the Editors-in-Chief” series is with Prof. Dr. Kari J. Syrjänen, the editor of the...
Introducing Prof. Dr. George P. Patrinos   My name is George P. Patrinos and currently serve as Professor of Pharmacogenomics and...
Established in 2021, the Young Investigators Award (YIA) is supported by the journal Cells Tissues Organs. Once again, the Karger...


Share your opinion with us and leave a comment below!

Mike Dürst 07.03.2022 at 18:19

Yes, in copyediting, the hyphenation usage changes based on the context of the terms and it is not always consistent. As this is subjective, this is not handled in an automated fashion but instead as an interactive one. Terms represented in different forms (closed up, spaced, hyphenated) will be presented to the users in a categorized manner for their verification and action. Sufficient handles are provided to make these terms consistent according to the context of usage